Equally Yoked: The Story of Loving v. Virginia and the Legalization of Multiracial Marriage
During
the past fifty years, Western culture has experienced a significant shift in
its overall stance regarding multiethnic marriage. As late as 1966, seventeen
of the fifty states still enforced laws that prohibited certain types of racial
intermixing within the bonds of matrimony.[1]
The following year, however, the Supreme Court rendered such statutes
unconstitutional after hearing the groundbreaking case Loving v. Virginia.[2]
The Commonwealth of Virginia was one
of the states that did not permit couples from dissimilar ethnic backgrounds to
wed. In 1958 Richard Loving (a Caucasian) and Mildred Jeter (an African-American
with Rappahannock heritage) held their wedding ceremony in Washington, D.C.,
because the district had no such restrictions.[3]
Their attempt to curtail their state’s law, however, met with resistance when
they returned to their Virginia residence.
Law enforcement agents in the small
town of Central Point raided their home in the middle of the night. The sheriff
arrested them and ordered that they serve a jail sentence of one year for their
disregard of Virginia law. The judge offered to suspend the punishment if the
Lovings would agree to leave the state for twenty-five years, but instead they
decided to appeal the original ruling.[4]
Nine years later, their case
appeared before the Supreme Court, and, after a unanimous decision in favor of
the Lovings, Chief Justice Warren opined:
Marriage
is one of the “basic civil rights of man,” fundamental to our very existence
and survival. . . . To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a
basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statues, classifications
so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the
Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State’s citizens of liberty
without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom
of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under
our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not to marry, a person of another
race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State.[5]
As
a result of this decision, multiethnic marriages became legal in all fifty
states. The percentage of such unions continues to rise.[6]
[1]For helpful figures that list the
states that forbade multiethnic marriage between 1866 and 1966, see the photographs
that appear between page 146 and 147 in the following work: Peter Wallenstein, Tell the Court I Love My Wife: Race,
Marriage, and Law—An American History (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2002).
For an informative analysis of the historical factors that led to a gradual
dismantling of the objections regarding multiethnic marriage in the United
States, see Renee C. Romano, Race Mixing:
Black-White Marriage in Postwar America (Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 2003), 12-43.
[2]Loving
v. Virginia, 388
U.S. 1 (1967).
[3]Werner Sollors, Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in
American History, Literature, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2000), 28.
[4]Paul R. Spickard, Mixed Blood: Intermarriage and Ethnic
Identity in Twentieth-Century America (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin
Press, 1989), 280.
[5]“U.S. Supreme Court: Loving v.
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), Justia,
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/388/1/case.html (accessed August 10,
2014). The court heard the case on April 10, 1967, and issued a decision on
June 12, 1967.
[6]Wendy
Wang, “The Rise of Intermarriage: Rates, Characteristics Vary by Race and
Gender,” Pew Research Center’s Social and Demographic Trends Project, http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/
(accessed
June 12, 2018).
Comments
Post a Comment